eComTechnology

eComTechnology
Interactive services

Sunday, 24 May 2026

DOJ Is Asking Apple and Google to Hand Over Data - or is weaponizing official?


DOJ Is Asking Apple and Google to Hand Over Data on 100,000 Users of a Car App
The requests are related to a lawsuit alleging EZ Lynk helped users bypass their cars’ emissions controls.
BY BRUCE GILPUBLISHED MAY 15, 2026, 7:00 AM ET

READING TIME 2 MINUTES

© Mandel Ngan/Getty Images
READ LATER COMMENTS (13)



The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking the identities, addresses, and purchase histories of at least 100,000 people who used a car app tied to alleged Clean Air Act violations.

Forbes reports that the DOJ issued subpoenas in March and April to Google, Apple, Amazon, and Walmart seeking user records connected to EZ Lynk, the maker of the Auto Agent app and a related car diagnostic tool.


The subpoenas are part of an ongoing case against EZ Lynk. The company was first sued in 2021 for allegedly manufacturing and selling a device designed to bypass computerized emissions controls on cars.

“Emissions controls on cars and trucks protect the public from harmful effects of air pollution. EZ Lynk has put the public’s health at risk by manufacturing and selling devices intended to disable those emissions controls,” U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said at the time. “Through our lawsuit, we will prevent Defendants from continuing to sell this product and impose civil penalties to hold them to account.”

Now, the government is trying to force major tech and retail companies to hand over information on people who downloaded the app or bought the EZ Lynk devices, in hopes of finding witnesses to testify in the case.

In a joint letter from EZ Lynk and the DOJ filed in court earlier this month, the government argued that its requests are fair and appropriate because lawyers want to interview witnesses about their use of EZ Lynk’s products.

The DOJ also argued that when EZ Lynk users provided their personal information to the company and agreed to its terms and conditions, they lost “a cognizable privacy interest as to that information.”

EZ Lynk, however, disagrees.

“These requests for potentially hundreds of thousands of people’s PII go well beyond the needs of this case and create serious privacy concerns,” EZ Lynk’s lawyers wrote in the letter, according to Forbes. “Investigating this claim does not require identifying each person who has used the product.”

The letter also claims that Google and Apple plan to challenge the subpoenas.

EZ Lynk, Google, Apple, Amazon, and Walmart did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s requests for comment.

EZ Lynk also claimed in the letter that this isn’t the first time the government has tried to obtain personal data about its customers. The company said the government in 2019 requested “a backdoor to the EZ Lynk system that would allow government monitoring of unsuspecting users.”

The government denied asking for an “inappropriate backdoor.”

Saturday, 23 May 2026

SpaceX shows its finances and future in IPO filing

  SpaceX shows its finances and future in IPO filing

SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch

SpaceX Falcon Heavy launch on April 29. Nurphoto/Getty Images

SpaceX filed its first comprehensive prospectus yesterday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, giving investors a peek at its finances, as it prepares to list on the Nasdaq exchange under the ticker SPCX.

The company aims to raise up to $80 billion at a valuation that could reach $2 trillion. It’s expected to surpass Saudi Aramco for the title of largest IPO in history. Elon Musk, SpaceX’s CEO, CTO, and chairman, will hold 85% of the company’s voting control. The listing will likely propel Musk to become the world’s first trillionaire.

So, how’s business?

SpaceX reported a net loss of $4.3 billion for Q1 2026, despite taking in $4.69 billion in revenue.

The company breaks its business down into three units: Space (rockets), Connectivity (Starlink satellite internet), and AI (xAI, the Grok chatbot, Colossus data centers). The Connectivity unit made $1.19 billion in the first quarter. By comparison, the Space unit lost $619 million, and the AI unit lost $2.5 billion.

Here are some other interesting factoids revealed by the filing:

  • For the 1 billion performance-based restricted shares that Musk received in January to vest, the company must establish a permanent human colony on Mars with at least 1 million inhabitants, “subject to Mr. Musk’s continued employment with us through the date on which achievement is certified by our board.”
  • SpaceX stock will be available to retail traders upon its debut via Robinhood, Schwab, Fidelity, E*Trade, and SoFi. Most appropriate company ever for hodlers to send to the moon?
  • The company spent $15 billion developing its updated version of the Starship megarocket.
  • SpaceX called the creation of trillion-dollar market opportunities one aspect of its “repeatable business model.” It sees a total addressable market of $28.5 trillion.

Zoom out: SpaceX’s IPO is likely to be the first of three massive public offerings this year, followed by OpenAI and Anthropic. But Musk won’t be done with big business deals—Wedbush analyst Dan Ives predicts that SpaceX and Tesla will merge in 2027.

Data readiness for agentic AI in financial services

Data readiness for agentic AI in financial services

MIT Technology Review · 22 minutes ago
by MIT Technology Review Insights · Artificial intelligence



Financial services companies have unique needs when it comes to business AI. They operate in one of the most highly regulated sectors while responding to external events that are updated by the second. As a result, the success of agentic AI in financial services depends less on the sophistication of the system and more on the quality, security, and accessibility of the data it relies on.

“It all starts with the data,” says Steve Mayzak, global managing director of Search AI at Elastic.

Agentic AI—systems that can independently plan and take actions to complete tasks, rather than simply generate responses—holds enormous potential for financial services due to its ability to incorporate real-time data and optimize complex workflows. Gartner has found that more than half of financial services teams have already implemented or plan to implement agentic AI.

However, introducing autonomous AI into any organization magnifies both the strengths and weaknesses of the underlying data it uses. To deploy agentic AI with speed, confidence, and control, financial services companies must first be able to search, secure, and contextualize their data at scale. “Agentic AI amplifies the weakest link in the chain: data availability and quality,” says Mayzak. “And your systems are only as good as their weakest link.”

Financial services companies, therefore, require a trusted and centralized data store that is easy to access, dependable, and can be managed at scale.
The high stakes of quality information

Regulation in the financial services sector requires a high degree of accountability for all data tools. As Mayzak says, “You can’t just stop at explaining where the data came from and what it was transformed into: ‘Here’s the data that went in, and this is what came out.’ You need an auditable and governable way to explain what information the model found and the logic of why that data was right for the next step.” That is, you need to be able to see, understand, and describe the underlying processes.

At the same time, financial services companies require speed and accuracy in order to meet customer expectations and stay ahead of competition. Markets are continually shifting, and risks and opportunities move along with them. If an AI model can parse natural language (unstructured data) from complex sources—in addition to structured data in spreadsheets that are easier to analyze—this gives users more relevant information.

In this environment, there is no tolerance for error, including the hallucinations that plagued early AI efforts. Agentic AI systems depend on rapid access to high-quality, well-governed data that is secure and accessible. In financial services, that data spans transactions, customer interactions, risk signals, policies, and historical context. The task of preparing that data for AI should not be underestimated. “Natural language is way more messy than structured data, and that makes the process of organizing and cleaning it up that much more important and also that much harder,” says Mayzak.

The data must be well indexed and consolidated across different locations, not locked in the silos of separate systems across the organization. Otherwise, AI agents lag, provide inconsistent answers, and produce decisions that are harder to trace and explain, undermining confidence among regulators, customers, and internal stakeholders.

As Mayzak says, “There are many different ways to describe how to execute a trade at a bank. In an agent-powered world, we need those descriptions to be deterministic—to give the same results every time. Yet we’re building on powerful but non-deterministic models. That’s incredibly tricky, but not impossible.”

For a financial services firm, managing this can be very challenging. A Forrester study found that 57% of financial organizations are still developing the necessary internal capabilities to fully leverage agentic AI. “The data exists in many different formats, created over the course of a bank’s history,” says Mayzak. “Take any bank that’s been around for 50 years: They might have 60 different types of PDFs for the exact same thing. And at the same time, we want the output of these systems to be 100% accurate. In many cases, there is no ‘good enough’.” That is, companies need to do it right, and the first time.
Searching and securing results

An effective search platform is key to solving the problem of fragmented, poorly indexed, inaccessible data. Financial services companies that can readily sift through both their structured and unstructured data, keep it secure, and apply it in the right context will get the most value from agentic AI. This often requires designing AI systems with data access and utility in mind so they can work faster and yield more accurate results, as well as reduce risk. “Search is the foundational technology that makes AI accurate and grounded in real data,” Mayzak says. “Search platforms have become the authoritative context and memory stores that will power this AI revolution.”

Once in place, these AI-enhanced searches and autonomous systems can serve financial services companies for a range of purposes. When monitoring client exposure, agentic AI can continuously scan transactions, market signals, and external data to detect emerging risks; platforms can then automatically flag or escalate issues in real time. In trade monitoring, AI agents can review trade workflows, identify discrepancies across different formats, and resolve exceptions step by step with minimal human intervention. In regulatory reporting, AI can gather data from across systems, generate required reports, and track how each output was produced. These applications of AI save time while supporting audit and compliance needs by being traceable and explainable.

Although such capabilities already exist, they are often manual, fragmented, and difficult to scale. Agentic AI allows financial organizations to move toward more automated, efficient, and scalable processes while maintaining the accuracy and transparency required in their highly regulated environment. As Mayzak says, “It’s not that different from how humans operate today, just done at a much faster pace and at scale.”
Building an agentic AI ecosystem

Launching agentic AI can be daunting, especially if other AI ventures have stalled internally. Mayzak’s recommendation is to choose a manageable use case and allow it to grow over time. “Success can build on success,” he says. “While companies may aim to automate a 70-step business process, they are discovering that you have to start somewhere. What is working in the market is tackling the problem one step at a time. Once you get the first step working, then you can take the next step, and the next.”

The financial services organizations that lead among their peers will be those that integrate agentic AI into a broader ecosystem that includes strong security controls, good data governance, and effective management of system performance. As Mayzak says, “Doing this well will create an AI feedback loop, where executives gain new signals from these systems to assess the effectiveness of their investments and generate reliable, actionable insights.” By iterating on pilots and continuously improving, companies will build agentic systems that can be measured, managed, and scaled. This will transform agentic AI into lasting competitive advantage.

Learn more about how Elastic supports financial services.


This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.

Friday, 22 May 2026

OpenAI did not respect Canadian privacy laws in developing ChatGPT, probe finds - Victoria Times Colonist

OpenAI did not respect Canadian privacy laws in developing ChatGPT, probe finds - Victoria Times Colonist

OpenAI did not respect Canadian privacy laws in developing ChatGPT, probe finds
OTTAWA — Federal and provincial watchdogs say OpenAI failed to respect Canadian privacy laws when training its artificial intelligence-powered ChatGPT chatbot.
Jim Bronskill and Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press29 minutes ago





The OpenAI logo is seen displayed on a cellphone with an image on a computer screen generated by ChatGPT's Dall-E text-to-image model, Friday, Dec. 8, 2023, in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)


OTTAWA — Federal and provincial watchdogs say OpenAI failed to respect Canadian privacy laws when training its artificial intelligence-powered ChatGPT chatbot.

The conclusion came in a report released Wednesday following a joint investigation by federal privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne and his counterparts from British Columbia, Alberta and Quebec.

ChatGPT, released in November 2022, is a popular conversation-style tool that responds to online users' prompts with a wide range of information almost instantly — responses that may or may not be accurate.

They found OpenAI's collection of information to train its models was overly broad, resulting in the compilation and use of sensitive personal details.




The privacy watchdogs said this could include data about individuals' health conditions and political views, as well as information concerning children.

The probe found OpenAI did not clearly explain that personal information collected from publicly accessible sources could include data from social media, discussion forums and other similar websites.

"OpenAI launched ChatGPT without having fully addressed known privacy issues," Dufresne said in French at a news conference. "This exposed Canadians to potential risks of harm such as breaches and discrimination on the basis of information about them."



The privacy watchdogs said OpenAI provided inadequate notifications about potential inaccuracies in ChatGPT responses, and until recently had not conducted an assessment to validate the accuracy of any personal information included in responses.

OpenAI also did not provide all individuals with an easily accessible and effective mechanism to access, correct and delete their personal information, the watchdogs said.

Dufresne said OpenAI took important steps to improve privacy protections and has also agreed to implement further measures to address his office's concerns.

"These measures will significantly limit the personal information that is used to train new ChatGPT models, and will better protect the fundamental right to privacy of Canadians," he said. "They will also make Canadians more aware of the implications of using ChatGPT."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 6, 2026.

Jim Bronskill and Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

Thursday, 21 May 2026

Oxford study says a chummy AI friend will lie and feed into your false beliefs - Digital Trends

Oxford study says a chummy AI friend will lie and feed into your false beliefs - Digital Trends

Oxford study says a chummy AI friend will lie and feed into your false beliefs
Your friendly AI buddy might actually be lying to you
By Vikhyaat Vivek Published April 30, 2026 11:31 AM
Unsplash

Making AI feel more human could be creating a bigger problem than expected. A new study from the Oxford Internet Institute revealed that chatbots designed to be warm and friendly are more likely to mislead users and reinforce incorrect beliefs.

The research found that AI becomes less reliable as it starts getting more agreeable.
What happens to a “friendly” AIAI Chatbot AI Chatbot

Researchers tested multiple AI models by training them to sound more empathetic and conversational. The result was a noticeable drop in accuracy. These “friendlier” versions made 10-30% more mistakes and were about 40% more likely to agree with false claims compared to their counterparts.

It even became worse when users appeared vulnerable or emotionally distressed. In these scenarios, the AI is more likely to validate what the user is saying rather than correcting it.
Why this is bad for you

What was concerning about the findings is how easily the AI could become agreeable. It would avoid challenging misinformation and also tend to entertain and support wrong/incorrect ideas. During testing, the AI “buddy” was found hesitating in correcting even widely debunked claims and sometimes framing false beliefs as “open to interpretation.” Researchers noted this as something closer to human tendencies to some extent.AI Chatbots Unsplash

Being empathetic and brutally honest at the same time isn’t always easy, and it seems like AI doesn’t handle this dilemma any better. With AI chatbots increasingly being used for advice, emotional support, and everyday decision-making, this is more than just an academic concern. The study highlights how relying on AI for guidance can backfire, as the system will prioritize agreement over accuracy that may reinforce harmful thinking patterns and promote misinformation.

This arrives at a time when major AI platforms such as OpenAI and Anthropic, along with social chatbot apps like Replika and Character.ai, are leaning into more companion-like AI experiences. In the study, the researchers tested several AI models, including GPT-4o.

So AI might feel like your friend, but it doesn’t always have the best answers for you.


Vikhyaat Vivek

instagramlinkedinEmail
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…

Wednesday, 20 May 2026

Zoom Has a ‘SWAT Team’ to Stand Out on ChatGPT and Gemini - WSJ

Zoom Has a ‘SWAT Team’ to Stand Out on ChatGPT and Gemini - WSJ

Yet another new job duty has skyrocketed in importance for chief marketing officers: optimizing how their companies appear in conversations with large language models like ChatGPT or Google Gemini.

For Kimberly Storin, CMO at the video meeting provider Zoom Communications, that has meant working quickly to stay on top of emerging research and trying to make sure material—whether it’s chatter on Reddit or executive commentary on LinkedIn—is showing up in a way that leads users to consider Zoom.

Tuesday, 19 May 2026

What You Need to Know About the Foreign-Made Router Ban in the US | WIRED

What You Need to Know About the Foreign-Made Router Ban in the US | WIRED

Everything You Need to Know About the Foreign-Made Router Ban in the US

The FCC just banned the sale of new consumer-grade Wi-Fi routers manufactured outside the US. Here’s what it means for you.
Detail of an Asus ZenWiFi BT8 router for triband WiFi 7 photographed on an orange background.
Photograph: Future Publishing/Getty Images

All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.

The Federal Communications Commission has banned new consumer internet routers manufactured outside the US, citing national security concerns. The ban doesn’t affect any routers already in American homes or currently on sale in the US, but all new routers aimed at the consumer market will need to be approved.

While the headline is that foreign-made consumer routers are banned, manufacturers can apply for exemptions. There's no need to throw out your router, and you'll still find plenty of mesh systems on the store shelves. But what does this mean for you?

Why Are Foreign-Made Routers Banned?

“Malicious actors have exploited security gaps in foreign-made routers to attack American households, disrupt networks, enable espionage, and facilitate intellectual property theft,” the FCC wrote. “Foreign-made routers were also involved in the Volt, Flax, and Salt Typhoon cyberattacks targeting vital US infrastructure.”

Foreign-made consumer routers were added to the Covered List, which details equipment and services “deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States.”

Bogdan Botezatu, director of Threat Research at cybersecurity firm Bitdefender, says this ban is a step to harden the cybersecurity readiness of US households, given ongoing geopolitical tensions.

“Consumer routers sit at the edge of every home network, which makes them an attractive target and a strategic risk if compromised at scale,” he says. Asked whether he thinks the risk is real, Botezatu says yes, though there’s no easy way to prove intent. “[Internet of Things] devices, including routers, are a weak point across the internet.”

Which Routers Are Banned?

The ban only affects the sale of new Wi-Fi routers aimed at consumer households. The ban does not apply to existing FCC-approved routers on sale in the US. Previously purchased routers already in use in homes across the country are also fine and are not part of the ban, according to the FCC’s FAQ. These routers can continue to be sold, used, and updated with new firmware.

Any new router manufactured outside the US now requires FCC approval before it can be imported, marketed, or sold in the US. This includes routers from US companies that are manufactured overseas, which is the vast majority of the market right now.

What Does Foreign-Made Mean?

This is decidedly murky. The ban is concerned with “consumer-grade” routers and could include any that are designed or manufactured outside the US or manufactured by companies that are not completely US-owned and operated. All the major players in the market, including Netgear, TP-Link, Asus, Amazon’s Eero, Google’s Nest, Synology, Linksys, and Ubiquiti, fall under the definition. As do most, if not all, of the routers supplied by internet service providers in the US.

Just like the recent federal drone ban, the router ban only applies only to new routers, but manufacturers can apply for Conditional Approval from the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security. Applications must include details about ownership, board membership, and country of origin for components, IP ownership, design, assembly, and firmware, among other things. The final section requests details of the applicant’s US manufacturing and onshoring plan, so there’s a clear push to persuade companies to commit to making their routers in the US.

“No routers or manufacturers have been granted a Conditional Approval so far, but as the process gets underway, we expect approvals to be granted in a timely manner,” an FCC spokesperson tells WIRED.

What About Foreign-Made Components?

Well, the FCC provides some clarification in its FAQ (“covered” here means banned):

“Non-'covered' devices do not become ‘covered’ simply because they contain a 'covered' component part, unless the 'covered' component part is a modular transmitter under the FCC’s rules,” it says. “Therefore, a router produced in the United States is not considered ‘covered’ equipment solely because it contains one or more foreign-made components.”

Manufacturers importing components from China but assembling them in the US will presumably be OK, though it’s far from clear. “Applicants will need to be able to have sufficient evidence that the routers were not produced in a foreign country to make this certification, but there is no specific documentation or evidence required,” according to the FCC.

Let's look at the big three US router brands and see how they're affected.

Will TP-Link Be Banned?

Since all of its routers are made overseas, TP-Link will have to apply for Conditional Approval or spin up manufacturing in the US to sell any new routers. Estimates vary, but TP-Link’s US consumer router market share is somewhere around 35 percent, with Netgear and Asus accounting for another 25 percent or so.

The US Commerce, Defense, and Justice departments have reportedly been investigating and considering a ban on TP-Link routers for more than a year over concerns about the company’s links to China. No ban has been enacted until now, but Texas attorney general Ken Paxton sued TP-Link in February, claiming the company allows the Chinese Communist Party to access American consumers’ devices. Detractors have also criticized perceived predatory pricing, claiming TP-Link flooded the US market with a wide range of affordable routers to establish dominance.

TP-Link has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and claims it has divested from its Chinese roots and is now headquartered in the US with the bulk of manufacturing in Vietnam. TP-Link’s cofounder and CEO, Jeffrey Chao, recently applied for permanent US residency through President Trump’s Gold Card program, according to the Times of India.

“Virtually all routers are made outside the United States, including those produced by US-based companies like TP-Link, which manufactures its products in Vietnam,” a spokesperson from TP-Link tells WIRED. “It appears that the entire router industry will be impacted by the FCC’s announcement concerning new devices not previously authorized by the FCC.”

TP-Link is a privately owned company and not publicly listed on any stock exchange. Chao and his wife, Hillary, are listed as the company's sole owners.

Will Netgear Be Banned?

While it is a US-founded and headquartered company, Netgear’s routers are manufactured abroad, mostly in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and Taiwan, so it will have to apply for Conditional Approval. The company has moved away from China in recent years. Netgear has been lobbying the government on “cybersecurity and strategic competition with China.”

“We commend the administration and the FCC for their action toward a safer digital future for Americans,” a Netgear spokesperson tells WIRED. “Home routers and mesh systems are critical to national security and consumer protection, and today’s decision is a step forward.”

Netgear is a publicly traded company on the Nasdaq, mostly owned by institutional investors, including BlackRock and Vanguard. The company’s stock rose on news of the ban, suggesting that many investors believe it won’t be hit too hard.

Will Asus Be Banned?

Asus primarily makes its routers in Taiwan, though it has production facilities in China and works with several third-party manufacturers. Recent tariff pressures led the company to branch out to Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Mexico, and the Czech Republic, but the bulk of its routers still come from Taiwan or China. Asus will have to apply for Conditional Approval to sell new routers. The company did not respond to WIRED's request for comment.

Asus is listed on the Taiwanese Stock Exchange and is mostly owned by public shareholders. The ban doesn’t appear to have impacted its stock price.

Are Any Routers Manufactured in the US?

The only routers I know of that are manufactured in the US are some Starlink Wi-Fi routers, which are primarily made in Texas. Starlink is part of Elon Musk's SpaceX company, but many of the components in these routers come from East Asia.

Botezatu says what matters more than geography is the security model behind the product. Companies that invest in “long-term firmware support, vulnerabilitgy management, and built-in protection layers” offer stronger security.

How Will the Router Ban Impact Ordinary Folks?

It’s not entirely clear, but it probably won’t have a huge immediate impact. There is already a wide range of Wi-Fi 7 routers and mesh systems on the market that will continue to be sold—they enable speeds well in excess of what most people need at home. Whether companies spin up manufacturing in the US or find other ways to satisfy government agencies that their wares are not a security risk, the result is likely to be higher prices for consumers.

"This ruling has the potential to significantly disrupt the US consumer router market," Brandon Butler, a research manager of Network Infrastructure and Services at IDC tells WIRED. “In the near term, much will depend on how quickly conditional waivers are processed. Most vendors are likely to pursue them, but any delays could constrain supply and create upward pressure on pricing.”

If you haven't upgraded to the latest Wi-Fi 7 standard, now might be a good time to do it. But it's worth keeping in mind what you're buying. Botezatu says consumers should “stick with reputable manufacturers that have a track record of issuing updates and maintaining their devices. Check that your router is still supported and runing the latest firmware.”

Unanswered Questions

The ban does leave several unanswered questions. Why is it being applied only to consumer routers? Which routers or manufacturers will be granted a Conditional Approval? Why are the foreign-made routers currently on sale and in our homes deemed safe? The FCC did not address these questions.

Monday, 18 May 2026

AI is already interviewing job candidates

  

Sunday, 17 May 2026

Apple has a happy Mac problem

 

Saturday, 16 May 2026

UAE leaves OPEC in a big blow to the oil cartel

 UAE leaves OPEC in a big blow to the oil cartel

Dubai skyline

Fadel Senna/Getty Images

The UAE is like the friend who just announced in the group chat that they’re taking their own car on the road trip. The Gulf nation announced yesterday that it’s leaving OPEC, the 12-nation oil cartel that accounts for half of global oil exports.

The oil-flush nation’s abrupt departure—which it said will happen on Friday—is a huge blow to the organization that coordinates countries’ oil outputs in order to control prices. The UAE is the third largest oil producer in OPEC, after Saudi Arabia and Iraq.

UAE-shaped hole

OPEC has already been losing its grip on the world’s oil supply in recent years, as the US fracking revolution floods global markets with American oil. But now, its sway will be even more limited.

The UAE said it’s leaving OPEC to have more freedom to decide how much oil to sell, and that it plans to gradually grow oil production as the world demands more of it:

  • Before the closure of the Strait of Hormuz forced the country to reduce oil shipments, it produced 3.6 million barrels of oil daily, maxing out its quota.
  • It seeks to boost production to 5 million barrels daily by 2027 by building pipelines or maximizing shipments once the strait reopens.

There are likely geopolitical reasons, too: The UAE is engaged in a regional rivalry with Saudi Arabia, which is the de facto leader of OPEC. The two countries have the most oil sloshing around beyond what OPEC allows to be exported.

Why now? The UAE says it made the decision to bid OPEC adieu now, amid the Iran war, when it would have the least disruptive impact, since oil prices are at multi-year highs.

Looking ahead: Experts say that while OPEC losing the UAE might not suppress oil prices in the near future it might make them more volatile in the long term.

Friday, 15 May 2026

Ottawa Greenlights $4B Enbridge Gas Pipeline Expansion in B.C.

Ottawa Greenlights $4B Enbridge Gas Pipeline Expansion in B.C.
April 26, 2026
Reading time: 7 minutes

Full Story: The Canadian Press
Author: Lauren Krugel, Ian Bickis, Nick Murray



Mack Male/Flickr



The federal government has approved a $4-billion plan by Enbridge Inc. to expand an existing natural gas pipeline in British Columbia, a move one executive says demonstrates a greater “sense of purpose” from Ottawa toward bolstering Canada’s status as a global energy exporter.

The Sunrise project would add 300 million cubic feet per day of transportation capacity on Enbridge’s 3.6-billion-cubic-feet-per-day Westcoast system, which connects gas fields in northeastern B.C. and northwestern Alberta to the Canada-U.S. border. The project involves adding almost 140 kilometres of new pipe by constructing 11 looping segments parallel to the existing line.

The gas that would flow through the expanded line is not bound for any particular destination, but “some of the capacity will no doubt go offshore,” Matthew Akman, who leads Enbridge’s gas transmission and midstream business, told reporters on April 24.

Sunrise was not reviewed under federal legislation passed last year meant to speed along new infrastructure deemed in Canada’s national interest. Nonetheless, Akman said he appreciates the improved tone under Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government.
‘Do it Faster’

“There’s more of a sense of purpose and an intent and a prioritization, which is what we need to see in Canada,” Akman said.

“Going forward, though, I think we all need to work more closely together to make this even faster. And there are ways to have just as rigorous a consultation process, just as rigorous an environmental review process and community engagement process, but do it faster.

“We’ve been at this project almost four years already and still don’t have a shovel in the ground.”

The approval is part of the government’s effort to get more projects moving, faster, said Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson during a speech in Toronto on Friday.

“For too long, we became accustomed to mistaking delay for seriousness. But seriousness is not measured by how long a country takes to make decisions, it is measured by whether those decisions are thoughtful, credible and made in a timeframe that actually matters.”

He said the Sunrise project will provide more supply for heating buildings, provide gas for electric power generation and industrial and manufacturing processes as well as ensure enough supply of LNG.

The project will add more than $3 billion to Canada’s GDP and create some 2,500 jobs at peak construction, said Hodgson.

He said the government will be ushering more projects ahead to actually being built. By spring 2027, there will be not only more projects added to the major projects office, but at least five to 10 new projects reaching a final investment decision or broken ground.

“Canada is building again.”

B.C. Premier David Eby said the Sunrise expansion is good news for jobs in his province.

“At a time of uncertainty and global instability, this is how we create the prosperity needed to pay for the public services that make us all better off,” he said in a news release.

But Alex Walker, energy analytics program director with Environmental Defence Canada, called Ottawa’s approval “a disastrous climate decision that prioritizes fossil fuel industry growth over Canada’s climate commitments.”

Construction on the pipeline is expected to begin this summer, with startup targeted for late 2028.

All of the soon-to-be built space on the Sunrise project has been spoken for, Akman said, noting the company is also expanding gas infrastructure in the northern part of B.C.

Last year, Enbridge inked a partnership with an alliance of three dozen First Nations in B.C. for a 12.5 ownership stake in the existing Westcoast pipeline. Akman said those groups are not obligated to take on equity of the pipeline expansion, but have the option to do so.

Akman said there is opportunity to build even more gas pipeline capacity—from scratch or by expanding existing infrastructure—under the right conditions.

One is to ensure a speedy review process “because we can’t tie capital up forever doing these things.”

Another is to ensure Canadian investments can compete with projects being pursued in the United States, where Enbridge has a substantial presence and has been seeing better returns.

“We’re a large company with investors all over the world,” Akman said. “So if we see competitive returns on capital in British Columbia, then we could do any of those types of investments.”
Geopolitical Issues at Play

In the context of the current global energy crisis, fuelled in large part by the war in Iran and its disruption of oil and gas supply chains, this pipeline is a big deal, according to experts who spoke with The Canadian Press.

“It’s another step toward diversifying our asset base in a world hungry for this,” said Jay Khosla, the executive director of economic and energy policy with the Public Policy Forum and a former assistant deputy minister in the Privy Council Office.

“The South Koreans in particular are out there begging for any source of supply of gas at this moment in time. The Nepalese and the Bangladeshis and the Pakistanis are running out of cooking fuel, which is gas-based, (and) are moving to 4-day work weeks because the Qatari supply has been taken off the market,” he said.

“This is all an effort to address that.”
Leverage For Canada-U.S. Relations

While the expanded pipeline will help Canada meet the broader goal of reducing its reliance on the United States as a customer, it also helps position Canada as a necessary supplier to the United States.

“For a long time, the shale revolution in the United States was flooded with natural gas, and now we’re starting to pick up again where the United States is importing more from Canada and wants more from Canada,” said Heather Exner-Pirot, a senior fellow and director of energy, natural resources and environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

“They need more AI. They need more data centres. And they are exporting more LNG than they’ve ever exported, and we’re talking about non-renewable resources.

“So I feel in my heart in the next 10 or 15 years, Canadian natural gas is going to be very important to the American natural gas story.”

Khosla added that expanding Canada’s export capacity could put it in a better position as it prepares to formally begin negotiations on the mandatory review of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, better known as CUSMA.

“It really allows us to catalyze something that we’ve been trying to do for a long time, which is market diversification, leverage with the U.S., and for sure I do think that it could help with CUSMA,” Khosla said.

“I know for a fact, and we’ve heard that, the president (Donald Trump) is not really thrilled that we’re supplying Chinese markets with our oil right now because he knows he needs all of that.

“Like we give them pretty much 25% of their source supply. All of these moves are very, very helpful to give us some leverage—and we don’t have a lot, let’s be honest.”
The Carney Government’s Political Play

Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to build big and build fast as he tries to shore up Canada’s economy in the face of U.S. protectionism and tariffs. But approving a new pipeline is a complicated process fraught with political landmines and opposition from environment groups and many Indigenous communities.

While Exner-Pirot said the expansion itself isn’t that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things—she described Enbridge’s $4 billion investment as “table stakes”—she sees this as an easy win for the Carney government because it’s natural gas, and British Columbia isn’t opposed to it.

“It’s good that we’ll have construction. That’s going to be very helpful for the B.C. economy, so it’s absolutely not nothing,” Exner-Pirot said.

“And there was Indigenous support. So a very easy thing for them to do and to say, ‘We are building and we are being an energy superpower.”

Khosla agreed that having both Indigenous support and ownership behind the project was key to pushing it through. He noted it was done without the need to refer it to the major projects office.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 24, 2026

Thursday, 14 May 2026

Bosses Are Blowing More Money on AI Agents

Bosses Are Blowing More Money on AI Agents Than It’d Cost Them to Just Pay Human Workers
"The cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees."

By Frank Landymore

Published Apr 27, 2026 4:14 PM EDT
Add Futurism(opens in a new tab)More information


Getty / Futurism

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech
Email addressSign Up

Mindlessly unleashing AI agents to take over employees’ jobs can be pretty costly, it turns out. Some companies are learning the hard way that paying for the incredible volume of AI agent requests is costing more than what they’d pay their human employees, Axios reports.

AIs can perform all sorts of tasks, ranging from the rote to the complex. But one of the most popular ways it’s being used in the workplace is to generate mountains of code at a pace far greater than a human could achieve. Sometimes, software engineers will even run multiple AI agents at the same time, all working on different tasks in the background without supervision. Each of these tasks costs tokens, and the bill can quickly add up.

“For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees,” Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, told Axios.

The problem has become harder to ignore as organizations are increasingly reliant on using AI tools and agents — including the organizations building them. “Pretty much 100 percent” of Anthropic’s code is now AI-generated, the company’s head of Claude Code Boris Cherny claimed earlier this year. Google and Microsoft’s bosses claim that this share is around a quarter of their companies’ code. Meta employees performance reviews are now partly based on how much AI they use, showing that a lot of the push towards using AI is coming from the top.

It probably doesn’t help that many tech workers are treating their token bills as member-measuring contests, using millions of tokens in a single day. The slang for this, we regret to inform you, is “tokenmaxxing,” with some power users racking up monthly token bills north of $150,000. “I probably spend more than my salary on Claude,” Max Linder, a software engineer in Stockholm, told The New York Times last month. Uber engineers using Claude Code have already blown through the company’s entire 2026 AI budget, The Information reported.

Tech leaders’ attempts to grapple with the situation can sound nearly as comical as the dilemma itself. In March, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang proposed giving software engineers AI tokens equal to roughly half their base salary, something he said could be used as a recruiting tool. Why be wooed by a signing bonus, when if you work for us, you get to use more AI?

At the same time, it’s a clear money-making opportunity for AI providers. One OpenAI investor told Axios that the concern over token costs could benefit them, since they believe Codex uses tokens more efficiently than Anthropic’s Claude Code. Anthropic, meanwhile, has cashed in by raising its pricing.

In all, the token costs are just one of many major question marks over AI automation. The jury’s still out on whether using error-prone AIs is more efficient and worth the potential havoc they can wreak internally — as evidenced by incidents at Meta and Amazon, among others — while numerous studies suggest that forcing workers to use AI tools could actually be making their jobs harder.

More on AI: Devious New AI Tool “Clones” Software So That the Original Creator Doesn’t Hold a Copyright Over the New Version



Frank Landymore
Contributing Writer


I’m a tech and science correspondent for Futurism, where I’m particularly interested in astrophysics, the business and ethics of artificial intelligence and automation, and the environment.

Wednesday, 13 May 2026

We are announcing an amended agreement

 OpenAI shakes up partnership with Microsoft, capping revenue share payments

Published Mon, Apr 27 20269:03 AM EDTUpdated 2 Min Ago

Ashley Capoot@/in/ashley-capoot/WATCH LIVE
Key Points
OpenAI and Microsoft announced major changes to their working relationship.
Microsoft’s license to OpenAI intellectual property will no longer be exclusive.
OpenAI will keep paying a revenue share to Microsoft, but Microsoft will stop paying one to OpenAI.

In this articleAMZN-2.84 (-1.08%)
GOOGL+4.21 (+1.22%)
CRWV-2.71 (-2.46%)
NBIS-2.82 (-1.92%)
Follow your favorite stocksCREATE FREE ACCOUNT

CEO of OpenAI Sam Altman speaks during the 2026 Infrastructure Summit of government officials, corporate executives, and labor leaders, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 11, 2026.
Kylie Cooper | Reuters


OpenAI and Microsoft on Monday announced a revamped partnership agreement that will allow the artificial intelligence company to cap revenue share payments and serve customers across any cloud provider.

As part of the new agreement, the companies said revenue share payments from OpenAI to Microsoft will be “subject to a total cap,” but they will continue through 2030, “independent of OpenAI’s technology progress.” Microsoft no longer needs to determine its response if OpenAI finds that it has reached artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which is a term for an AI system that rivals or exceeds human intelligence.


The revenue sharing agreement between the two companies has existed for years. OpenAI will pay Microsoft at the same percentage, which is 20%, as part of the new deal, according to a source familiar with agreement who asked not to be named because the details are confidential. Microsoft will no longer pay a revenue share to OpenAI, according to a blog post.

The two companies said Microsoft remains OpenAI’s primary cloud provider, and that OpenAI products will ship first on Azure unless Microsoft decides otherwise. However, OpenAI can now serve “all of its products” to customers across any provider, including Microsoft rivals Amazon and Google.

Microsoft has been one of OpenAI’s longtime backers, investing more than $13 billion in the company since 2019. The companies have continued to tout their relationship as core and strategic, but it’s shown signs of strain in recent months as the partners move onto the other’s turf. In a memo earlier this month, Denise Dresser, OpenAI’s revenue chief, said the partnership has “limited our ability to meet enterprises where they are.”

“Today, we are announcing an amended agreement to simplify our partnership and the way we work together, grounded in flexibility, certainty, and a focus on delivering the benefits of AI broadly,” OpenAI said.

Microsoft will continue to have a license to OpenAI’s intellectual property on AI models through 2032, although the license will no longer be exclusive, the two companies said.


Shares of Microsoft are down roughly 1% on Monday.

The revamped partnership comes after Microsoft and OpenAI announced a series of changes to their agreement in October, when OpenAI completed a recapitalization and committed to spending $250 billion on Microsoft Azure cloud services. As part of that announcement, Microsoft said its investment for-profit arm was valued at $135 billion, or roughly 27% of the company on an as-converted diluted basis.

But in the months since, OpenAI has been looking to diversify its reach, striking multi-billion dollar deals with Microsoft competitors like Amazon. Model developers are seeing customers run AI agents that carry out tasks over several hours. In recent weeks Meta committed to spending $48 billion with cloud providers CoreWeave and Nebius to supplement its own computing power.

Amazon and OpenAI formed a major strategic partnership in February, and Amazon agreed to invest up to $50 billion in the company as part of that agreement. OpenAI said it would expand its existing $38 billion agreement with Amazon Web Services by $100 billion over the next eight years. AWS will also serve as the exclusive third-party cloud distribution provider for OpenAI’s enterprise platform Frontier, which it unveiled earlier this month.

Following that announcement, Microsoft and OpenAI released a joint statement that said their partnership remained “strong and central.”

— CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed to this report.

Interactive Communications

Interactive Communications
Interactive Communications VOIP and VPN

eComTechnology RG Richardson Communications

eComTechnology since 2003. I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and secure VOIP and Mail Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance. RG Richardson City author has over 300 travel guides. Let our interactive search city guides do the searching, no more typing, and they never go out of date. With over 13,900 preset searches, you only have to click on the preset icon. Search for restaurants, hotels, hostels, Airbnb, pubs, clubs, fast food, coffee shops, real estate, historical sites and facts all just by clicking on the icon. Even how to pack is all there. Finance, Money, Banking, and Economics definitions interactive dictionary.

Dispute could rock the America’s Cup

  Dispute could rock the America’s Cup The America’s Cup has h...